Mr Teo Chee Hean
Blk 738 Pasir Ris Drive 10
#01-21
Singapore 510738
Dear Sir,
Government Departments
1. Criminal Intimidation. Posters were placed by the police at lift lobbies in my precinct on what constituted criminal intimidation. At first I did not take too much notice then realised it had just as much relevance as the poster showing a maid at a coffee shop that was placed at the lobby lift of my previous flat where I was staying.
The maid was saying that as a domestic help she was only allowed to work at the address she was registered.
I therefore wrote to the Ministry of Manpower whether the maid with the neighbour upstairs was registered as part of my complaint of noise from the neighbour. It would have proved or not proved that the neighbour was carrying on a trade in their flat because the maid was used as a subterfuge for the noise. I did not receive a reply from the Ministry.
Similarly, if the recording of CCTV installed at car park, stairway and lift were checked before and after the posters on criminal intimidation were placed, it would reveal whether a trade was being conducted at a flat. It would again prove or not prove as in the case of the maid. For intimidation to work, definite signs have to be shown and I have noticed. Please refer to my recent postings of letters to MPs that were followed by events not detailed here that led to my conclusion. The police is doing something because of the letter you wrote to them after Inquiry (27).
I wonder though whether there will be an end to the problem. Noise from the carrying of a trade by the neighbour occurred earlier than when I first reported in 1998. I approached MPs from 2008 when the neighbour restarted in 2007. They will not stop until there is a resolution.
2. Monetary Losses. Officers at HDB and CPF cause me monetary losses. These are outlined in Salient Point (40):
a) The $5000 deposit after the sale of our flat and the request for the death certificate of my father. What was the purpose of the deposit and would it be returned? What was the purpose in requesting the death certificate when it was not the required documents needed to bring to the meeting?
b) The $219.60 fee to include the name of my mother in the senior citizen apartment was a consequence of a setup to prevent me from applying for Silver Housing Bonus (SHB). When approval was given that we were eligible, officers charged that the fee was required because I had purchased the apartment in my name. The setup began with the handling officer in Item 2a) when she asked whether the cheque from the sale of our flat was to be made in my name when it should have been in both our names. It would seem the $5000 deposit (which I do not know what it was for) that was deducted from the sale of our flat was in my name.
c) The refund of CPF money from the sale of the flat that was used in the purchase of the flat. Officers, including a director, did not give a direct reply to the issue. I had referred them to supporting documents but it was not addressed. The reason the officers prevented the refund was because interest rate at CPF was higher than the banks.
d) Mistakes made in my CPF Life when I was asked to top-up CPF Life and in conjunction with Silver Housing Bonus (SHB) when money from CPF Retirement Account was transferred to CPF Life. In the first I should not had been asked to top-up because there is a provision for final top-up from the Retirement Account one month before age 65. Any top-up between the purchase of CPF Life and the final deduction from Retirement Account reduces the payout after age 65.
In the second the re-calculation of payout after an additional amount from interest earned for the year was obviously a mistake. The corresponding increase in the monthly payout is far less than if it were calculated using the lower base rate over a 30 years period. Actually the corresponding increase in monthly payout is less than the amount of interest earned for the year divided into equal monthly payment over a 30 years period.
My CPF Life payout begin in August 2019.
3. I need for your assistance in dealing with the wrongdoings.
Yours Sincerely,
hh
Observation
The maid was saying that as a domestic help she was only allowed to work at the address she was registered.
I therefore wrote to the Ministry of Manpower whether the maid with the neighbour upstairs was registered as part of my complaint of noise from the neighbour. It would have proved or not proved that the neighbour was carrying on a trade in their flat because the maid was used as a subterfuge for the noise. I did not receive a reply from the Ministry.
Similarly, if the recording of CCTV installed at car park, stairway and lift were checked before and after the posters on criminal intimidation were placed, it would reveal whether a trade was being conducted at a flat. It would again prove or not prove as in the case of the maid. For intimidation to work, definite signs have to be shown and I have noticed. Please refer to my recent postings of letters to MPs that were followed by events not detailed here that led to my conclusion. The police is doing something because of the letter you wrote to them after Inquiry (27).
I wonder though whether there will be an end to the problem. Noise from the carrying of a trade by the neighbour occurred earlier than when I first reported in 1998. I approached MPs from 2008 when the neighbour restarted in 2007. They will not stop until there is a resolution.
2. Monetary Losses. Officers at HDB and CPF cause me monetary losses. These are outlined in Salient Point (40):
a) The $5000 deposit after the sale of our flat and the request for the death certificate of my father. What was the purpose of the deposit and would it be returned? What was the purpose in requesting the death certificate when it was not the required documents needed to bring to the meeting?
b) The $219.60 fee to include the name of my mother in the senior citizen apartment was a consequence of a setup to prevent me from applying for Silver Housing Bonus (SHB). When approval was given that we were eligible, officers charged that the fee was required because I had purchased the apartment in my name. The setup began with the handling officer in Item 2a) when she asked whether the cheque from the sale of our flat was to be made in my name when it should have been in both our names. It would seem the $5000 deposit (which I do not know what it was for) that was deducted from the sale of our flat was in my name.
c) The refund of CPF money from the sale of the flat that was used in the purchase of the flat. Officers, including a director, did not give a direct reply to the issue. I had referred them to supporting documents but it was not addressed. The reason the officers prevented the refund was because interest rate at CPF was higher than the banks.
d) Mistakes made in my CPF Life when I was asked to top-up CPF Life and in conjunction with Silver Housing Bonus (SHB) when money from CPF Retirement Account was transferred to CPF Life. In the first I should not had been asked to top-up because there is a provision for final top-up from the Retirement Account one month before age 65. Any top-up between the purchase of CPF Life and the final deduction from Retirement Account reduces the payout after age 65.
In the second the re-calculation of payout after an additional amount from interest earned for the year was obviously a mistake. The corresponding increase in the monthly payout is far less than if it were calculated using the lower base rate over a 30 years period. Actually the corresponding increase in monthly payout is less than the amount of interest earned for the year divided into equal monthly payment over a 30 years period.
My CPF Life payout begin in August 2019.
3. I need for your assistance in dealing with the wrongdoings.
Yours Sincerely,
hh
Observation
1. The posters at the lift lobbies in my precinct:
CRIME ALERT
CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION
POLICE
If you have any information on this crime, please call Punggol NPC @ 1800-604 9999
CRIME ALERT
CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION
What is Criminal Intimidation?
PUNISHMENT:
Fine And/Or Imprisonment Up To 2 Years
The punishment is even higher for threats related to:
- threatens another with any injury to the person, reputation or property;
- to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do; and
- to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the execution of such threat.
PUNISHMENT:
Fine And/Or Imprisonment Up To 2 Years
The punishment is even higher for threats related to:
- causing death or grievous hurt;
- destruction of any property by fire;
- offence punishable with death or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years or more; and
- impute unchastity to a women.
POLICE
If you have any information on this crime, please call Punggol NPC @ 1800-604 9999
2. Five instances of monetary loss caused by officers that required the assistance of MPs.
No comments:
Post a Comment